Comments on: How NPR Covered the 10-21-2007 GOP Debate http://mrxfromplanetx.com/how-npr-covered-the-10-21-2007-gop-debate/ Mr. X Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:45:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Mr. X http://mrxfromplanetx.com/how-npr-covered-the-10-21-2007-gop-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-369 Mr. X Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:02:42 +0000 http://mrxfromplanetx.com/2008/05/17/how-npr-covered-the-10-21-2007-gop-debate/#comment-369 You make a valid point, but it doesn't have anything to do with how NPR covered this debate, except it's an issue not being addressed by NPR. What people should really take into consideration, is in every US backed coup (documented on these pages), the US was supposed to be saving the world from Communism or Socialism, only to install a fascist dictator. What does fascism involve if someone actually knows what it means? http://mrxfromplanetx.com/14/-points-of-fascism The wars and interventions only take place in the first place so a corporate stronghold can be maintained on a weaker countries assets. A country who will never gain strength because their assets are being sucked dry. It means privatizing assets. Ron Paul's theory is privatization is great, and that is the free market solution. The reality is only the most rich and powerful can afford to buy the countries assets. Corporations buy up all of their competition to eliminate their completion. According to Walter Lippmann in Public Opinion (1922), a free market never existed. I believe it never will. The rich will always have the power to pay off politicians for special favors. The only way to stop corporate power from taking over the world, and the way to create a free market would be to break up the corporations so they have to compete against each other. That's not a free market than is it if you have to step in and intervene so the rich and powerful won't buy everything up. That's the paradox of a free market. The problem on the liberal side is people commonly don't see how the rich and powerful have infiltrated the government and are running things for their own benefit. Even the FDA is riddled with VP's from the very corporations they are supposed to be regulating. http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/stories/2009/07/06/daily47.html http://www.organicconsumers.org/monlink.cfm It's pretty damn hopeless, but you never know. Things are certain to go to hell if no-one does anything. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2CCs-x9q9U You make a valid point, but it doesn’t have anything to do with how NPR covered this debate, except it’s an issue not being addressed by NPR.

What people should really take into consideration, is in every US backed coup (documented on these pages), the US was supposed to be saving the world from Communism or Socialism, only to install a fascist dictator.

What does fascism involve if someone actually knows what it means? http://mrxfromplanetx.com/14/-points-of-fascism

The wars and interventions only take place in the first place so a corporate stronghold can be maintained on a weaker countries assets. A country who will never gain strength because their assets are being sucked dry.

It means privatizing assets. Ron Paul’s theory is privatization is great, and that is the free market solution. The reality is only the most rich and powerful can afford to buy the countries assets. Corporations buy up all of their competition to eliminate their completion.

According to Walter Lippmann in Public Opinion (1922), a free market never existed. I believe it never will. The rich will always have the power to pay off politicians for special favors. The only way to stop corporate power from taking over the world, and the way to create a free market would be to break up the corporations so they have to compete against each other.

That’s not a free market than is it if you have to step in and intervene so the rich and powerful won’t buy everything up. That’s the paradox of a free market.

The problem on the liberal side is people commonly don’t see how the rich and powerful have infiltrated the government and are running things for their own benefit. Even the FDA is riddled with VP’s from the very corporations they are supposed to be regulating.

http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/stories/2009/07/06/daily47.html
http://www.organicconsumers.org/monlink.cfm

It’s pretty damn hopeless, but you never know. Things are certain to go to hell if no-one does anything.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2CCs-x9q9U

]]> By: Jules http://mrxfromplanetx.com/how-npr-covered-the-10-21-2007-gop-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-367 Jules Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:57:41 +0000 http://mrxfromplanetx.com/2008/05/17/how-npr-covered-the-10-21-2007-gop-debate/#comment-367 Hi, There are two key points that you're missing with regard to Ron Paul The first one is that he's all for reducing the influence of government in people's lives... with at least one key exception. He's on record as stating that one of the first things he wanted to do as President was to overturn Roe V. Wade. When it comes to abortion... Ron Paul is all in favor of government involvement! Given that there are an increasing number of stories now coming out regarding the selling of babies... including by religiously-affiliated adoption agencies... there is more behind the abortion issue than the right to life! The other key point with Ron Paul involves his desire to return to a metal currency. The gold and silver that he's all in favor of is being taken out of Indigenous lands... primarily in the U.S. and Canada... along with uranium (yellow cake) and most recently diamonds! Just as there are blood diamonds in Africa... we now have its equivalent in North America! Now... had you posted videos of Cynthia McKinney... I would be more in agreement with you! Regards, Jules Hi,

There are two key points that you’re missing with regard to Ron Paul The first one is that he’s all for reducing the influence of government in people’s lives… with at least one key exception. He’s on record as stating that one of the first things he wanted to do as President was to overturn Roe V. Wade. When it comes to abortion… Ron Paul is all in favor of government involvement! Given that there are an increasing number of stories now coming out regarding the selling of babies… including by religiously-affiliated adoption agencies… there is more behind the abortion issue than the right to life!

The other key point with Ron Paul involves his desire to return to a metal currency. The gold and silver that he’s all in favor of is being taken out of Indigenous lands… primarily in the U.S. and Canada… along with uranium (yellow cake) and most recently diamonds! Just as there are blood diamonds in Africa… we now have its equivalent in North America!

Now… had you posted videos of Cynthia McKinney… I would be more in agreement with you!

Regards,
Jules

]]> By: test » Blog Archive » How NPR Covered the 10-21-2007 GOP Debate http://mrxfromplanetx.com/how-npr-covered-the-10-21-2007-gop-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-60 test » Blog Archive » How NPR Covered the 10-21-2007 GOP Debate Sat, 17 May 2008 21:17:47 +0000 http://mrxfromplanetx.com/2008/05/17/how-npr-covered-the-10-21-2007-gop-debate/#comment-60 [...] NPR Covered the 10-21-2007 GOP Debate Loozianajay wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptMara Liasson kept managing to get the [...] [...] NPR Covered the 10-21-2007 GOP Debate Loozianajay wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptMara Liasson kept managing to get the [...]

]]>